考研英语新题型是整个英语试卷中，考生较容易做的题目。接下来，小编为帮助广大考研者们，在考研英语新题型上面少失分，特意分享-考研英语(一)新题型真题解析7选5(2013年)，供考生参考。

考研英语(一)新题型真题解析7选5(2013年)

The social sciences are flourishing. As of 2005 , there were almost half a million professional social scientists from all fields in the world, working both inside and outside academia, According to the World Social Science Report 2010, the number of social-science students worldwide has swollen by about 11% every year since 2000.

Yet this enormous resource is not contributing enough to today's global challenges ineluding climate change, security, sustainable development and health. (41)                                Humanity has the necessary agro-technological tools to eradicate hunger from genetically engineered crops to artificial fertilizers. Here, too, the problems are so cial: the organization and distribution of food, wealth and prosperity.

(42)                                   This is a shame-the community should be grasping the opportunity to raise its influence in the real world. To paraphrase the great social scientist Joseph Schumpeter: there is no radical innovation without creative destruction Today, the social sciences are largely focused on disciplinary problems and internal scholarly debates, rather than on topics with external impact. Analyses reveal that the numbers of papers including the keywords "environmental change"or "climate change" have increased rapidly since 2004. (43)                                            

When social scientists do tackle practical issues, their scope is often local: Belgium is interested mainly in the effects of poverty on Belgium, for example. And whetha er the community's work contributes much to an overall accumulation of knowledge is doubtful.

The problem is not necessarily the amount of available funding.(44)                                   This is an adequate amount so long as it is aimed in the right direction. Social scientists who complain about a lack of funding should not expect more in today's economic climate.

The trick is to direct these funds better. The European Union Framework funding programs have long had a category specifically targeted at social scientists. This year, it was proposed that the system be changed: Horizon 2020, a new program to be enacted in 2014,

would not have such a category. This has resulted in protests from social scientists. But the intention is not to neglect social science; rather, the complete opposite.(45)                                         That should create more collaborative endeavors and help to develop projects aimed directly at solving global problems.

[A] It could be that we are evolving two communities of social scientists: one that is discipline-oriented and publishing in highly specialized journals, and one that is problem-oriented and publishing elsewhere, such as policy briefs.

[B] However, the numbers are still small: in 2010, about 1,600 of the 100,000 social-sciences papers published globally included one of these Keywords.

[C] The idea is to force social scientists to integrate their work with other categories, including health and demographic change; food security; marine research and the bio-economy; clear, efficient energy; and inclusive, innovative and secure societies.

[D]The solution is to change the mindset of the academic community, and what it considers to be its main goal. Global challenges and social innovation ought to receive much more attention from scientists, especially the young ones.

[E]These issues all have root causes in human behavior: all requite behavioral change and social innovations, as well as technological development. Stemming climate change, for example, is as much about changing consumption patterns and promotine tax acceptance as it is about developing clean energy.

[F]Despite these factors, many social scientists seem reluctant to tackle such problems. And in Europe, some are up in arms over a proposal to drop a specific funding category for social-science research and to integrate it within cross-cutting topics of sustainable development.

[G]During the late 1990s, national spending on social sciences and the humanitiesas a percentage of all research and development funds-including government, highereducation, non-profit and corporate-varied from around 4% to 25%; in most European nations, it is about 15%.

参考译文

社会科学正蓬勃发展。直至2005年，全世界各个领域(包括学术界内外)专业社会科学家数量已经接近50万人。根据《2010年世界社会科学报道》，从2000年起，每年全世界社会科学学生数量增加大约11%。

然而，这样庞大的人力资源却不足以应对今天的全球性挑战。这些挑战包括气侯变化、安全保障、可持续发展和健康问题。这些问题的根本原因都在于人类行为：所有问题都需要行为改变、社会创新和科技发展。例如，遏制气候变化既需要发展清洁能源，也需要改变消费模式并促进税收验收。从基因工程作物到人造肥料，人类拥有必要的农业技术手段来消除饥荒。同样，现在这些问题是社会问题：食物组织与分配，财富与繁荣。

虽然存在这些因素，但许多社会科学家似乎不愿意解决这些问题。在欧洲，一些社会科学家竭力反对一项提议，该提议要求取消社会科学研究的专用基金项目，并将其合并到可持续发展的相关课题中。这确实可惜——科学团体应该抓住机遇，加强其在现实世界中的影响力。用伟大社会科学家约瑟夫·熊彼特的话说：没有创造性毁灭，就没有根本性创新。

如今，社会科学主要关注学科问题与内部学术讨论，而不是关注具有外界影响的话题。分析显示，自2004年以来，包含“环境变化”或“气候变化”等关键词的论文数量迅速增加。然而，这些数量仍然微不足道：2010年，全球发表的10万篇社会科学论文中，大约有1600篇含有其中一个关键词。

当社会科学家处理实际问题的时候，他们往往着眼于当地。例如，比利时主要对贫困在比利时造成的影响感兴趣。而该科学团体的工作是否对人类知识积累做出了很大贡献，这一点是令人质疑的。

问题未必在于可用资金数量。20世纪90年代末，国家在社会科学和人文学科的支出占所有研发资金(包括政府、高等教育、非营利机构和企业)的4%到25%;在大多数欧洲国家，该比重大约为15%。这笔资金数量是充足的，前提是被用到合适的地方。在当前的经济形势下，那些抱怨资金不足的社会科学家期望不该过高。

诀窍在于更好地管理这些资金。欧盟科研架构资金计划长期以来有一个专门针对社会科学家的项目。今年，人们提议将该体系修改为：新视野2020，这个新计划将于2014年发布，该计划将取消这种专门的资金项目。这引起了社会科学家的抗议。但是该计划的本意并非忽略社会科学，而是恰恰相反。该计划旨在让社会科学家将其工作成果与其他领域结合，包括健康与人口结构变化;食品安全;海洋研究与生物经济;清洁高效能源;以及包容、创新和安全的社会。这样可以促进共同努力，并有助于开发旨在解决全球问题的项目。

答案解析

41.答案[E]

解析

本空上句出现大量名词，可以当作关键词，如global challenges，climate change、sustainable development等词。选项[D]出现了global challenges;[E]出现了climate change;[F]出现了sustainable development;故可以将范围缩小到这三项中。由于上下句再无有价值的线索，可以利用选项本身，看看选项首句与文章是否吻合。[D]首句是The solution;[E]首句是These issues;[F]首句为Despite these factors。显然，上文提到的climate change，security，sustainable development，health等都是“问题”，故再次出现时可以用"These issues这些问题”来指代，故由此可以判断，该题正确答案为[E]。

42.[F]

解析

上句提到the problems are social，其中the problems可以看作关键词。只有两个选项出现了problems一词，[A]项的problem-oriented和[F]项的such problems。显然，[F]更接近原词。上文提到：the problems are social;[F]提到：many social scientists seem reluctant to tackle such problems;这两句可以形成衔接，并且such problems指代上文的the problems。为了进一步验证答案，我们接着看该空下句，该句说：This is a shame.出现代词this，说明this指代上文某件事，这件事是一件"shame憾事”。而[F]项提到"many social scientists seem reluctant to tackle such problems许多社会科学家似乎不愿意解决这些问题”，显然this指代这件事情。[F]填人42空上下文是通顺的，故该题选择[F]。

43.[B]

解析

本题上一句出现大量提示信息，例如：the number of papers、the keywords environmental change、climate change、since 2004;尤其注意时间和数字。时间和数字在文章中是最明显的，可以重点利用。显然，选项中带有时间的有[B][G]两项，故可以从这两项先看，如果这两项不吻合上下文，则再利用其他线索。我们发现，选项[B]的in 2010与上文since 2004照应;the numbers，papers是原词复现：还有上文的the keywords，[B]项复现these Keywords。所有这些信息都表明[B]为答案。

44.答案[G]

解析

上句关键词：the problem，available funding;下句关键词：This，adequate amount，其中，"This is an adequate amount"一句是重点，说明上文一定提到某个"adequate amount充足的数量"。所有选项浏览下来，并未发现adequate amount一词，但是[B][G]两项出现具体数量。显然，[B]项已选，且[B]项的papers，Keywords等词与该空上下文无关，故可以排除[B]项的可能性。而[G]项不仅出现了数量，还出现了funds、spending等词，这些词与上文的funding都是同义复现信息，故确定[G]为本题答案。

45.答案[C]

解析

上句关键词为：the intention，social science;下句关键词为：collaborative endeavors，本题从单词上看比较难判断，但是根据句型就显得简单了。上句提到：But the intention is not to..很明显，选项[C]The idea is to 和选项[D]The solution is to...与之结构相似，而两个结构相似的句子经常放在一起，形成一个平行并列结构。故答案可能在[C][D]之间。而[C]项出现的social scientists是上文的原词复现;other categories与上文such a category也是复现关系;此外，该项的integrate their work with other categories=下文create more collaborative endeavors，综上，[C]是正确答案。

      综上是“考研英语(一)新题型真题解析7选5(2013年)”，希望对考研学子们，复习英语上面有所帮助!